Cover of Puerto Rico en el mundo

Cover of Puerto Rico en el mundo

It is evident that globalization is a required topic of contempo­rary debate. Literature on the development of the supranation­al economy is now widespread, with definitions and conflicting interpretations that bring out diverging ideological and meth­odological approaches. This lit­erature is divided mostly among those who insist that globaliza­tion reinforces and develops de­mocracy and those who sustain that it restricts or inhibits it.

There are right wing and left wing optimists. Conservative defenders of capitalist democ­racy such as Francis Fukuyama (The End of History and the Last Man, 1992) sustain that the world hegemony of the United States represents the definitive victory of global democracy, bringing an “end of history.” Thomas Fried­man (The Lexus and the Olive Tree, 2000) echoes this theory, also claiming that the globaliza­tion of capital in itself represents the globalization of democracy.

Nevertheless, there are also defenders of globalization that come from the progressive wing. David Held (Democracy and Glob­al Order, 1996) and Ulrich Beck, (What is globalization?, 1998) provide a humanist vision and agree that globalization, crossed and organized by a transnational State with world government institutions, has the potential for extending human rights and fa­cilitating a global civil society and a just and righteous world.

Skeptics or pessimists come from both fields of the worldwide ideological spectrum. Some con­servative sectors regret the lack of control of the nation-state against the forces of the global market, adducing that it inexo­rably drives to anarchy and un­certainty (John Gray, False Dawn, 1998). Pat Buchanan, a well-known conservative commentator in the United States, insists that in his country, globalization has resulted in a mixture values that may lead to the decadence of national culture and institutions. This thesis is also adopted by Samuel Huntington, first in his popular book The Clash of Civilizations (1996) and, most recently, in his notorious essay Who are we? (2004). Here, he attacks multi­cultural claims and alerts of the dangers of hybridism that immi­gration, particularly from Mexico, poses for his country.

Another Look to Globalization

Another Look to Globalization

The non-conformist critique of globalization, on the other hand, comes from trade unions and the traditional left-wing. This group of skeptics, David Korten among them, (When Corporations Rule the World, 1996), sustains that only the nation-state can protect human and worker`s rights against the op­pression of uncontrolled capital­ism. They insist that democratic politics can only take place un­der the protection of a nation-state. Therefore, the transfer of sovereignty to the structures of a supranational, global order is detrimental for the development of democracy. Pierre Bourdieu, the late, well-known French sociologist, also outlines that the nation-state deserves to be seen as an effective coun­terbalance to the predatory ef­fects of the globalized market. In order to avoid going back to nationalism, however, he pro­poses strengthening regional, supranational organizations that may assume the universalism of social functions adopted by the welfare states as solid his­torical achievements.

The most convincing critique has been articulated by Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt in Em­pire. Their thesis suggests that the expansion of today`s global economy, when separated from the form of traditional imperialistic dominance, deserves the new name of “Empire”. This new “Empire” differs from modern-classic “imperialism” as it is not bound to any country, neither did it rise from conquest or other ways of hegemonic expansion. It rises from new form of sovereignty, made up national and supranational organism, structured under a new planetary logic. What is peculiar of this new globalized order is that the applicable regulation is developed outside the validation of national legislation, undermining, therefore, the traditional sovereignty of nation-state.

Nevertheless, Hardt and Negri do not focus the emergence of this global order as a concluded state of affairs, but rather from the perspective of the dynamics that produce it. In other words, it is a constituent dynamic process more than a finalized representa­tion. The authors insist that the Nation-State is about to conclude its historical cycle, which is be­ing displaced (denaturalized) by a non-territorial universal order that is unaware of physical fron­tiers and political confines. The system of world relationships that Hardt and Negri describe deserves the name of “Empire” because it imposes its control over all types of social organiza­tion, ordering human and hierar­chical relationships by controlling all components of the world we inhabit.

One of the most original con­cepts developed by Hardt and Negri is that of multitude. More than a political-sociological category of the individual, they propose lines of critical perspec­tive to separate the “multitude” from anachronistic terms such as peoples, mass, class, or pro­letariat. Multitude is not a new name for the nineteenth-cen­tury proletariat because it is not limited to the concept of social class. The multitude, Negri says, are “foot soldiers”, a multiplicity of singularities, already blended and immersed in the mix and hybridization of populations, able to analyze the world and organize “political actions based on what is common rather than on the hypostasis of the unit.” Since the multitude is nurtured, partly, by the weakening of the controls of the Nation-State, globalization has a positive aspect; mean­ing that the globalization of the world, although it contributes to poverty and exclusion (a negative operation), “also serves to remove and expose archaic powers and representation forms”.

Hardt and Negri propose, therefore, that the political chal­lenge we face today is not so much to resist the supranational economic and cultural processes but to reorganize and redirect them towards other purposes. They insist that the multitude”s creative forces are able to identify the root of the continuous spread of poverty and exclusion due to globalization, and of erecting alternate political organizations that will subvert these hierarchical controls, inventing new forms of democratic initiatives.

Roberto Gándara Sánchez
Centro de Investigación y Política Pública

 

 

Author: Proyectos FPH
Published: September 27, 2010.

Related Entries

This post is also available in: Español

Comente

The Puerto Rico Endowment for the Humanities welcomes the constructive comments that the readers of the Encyclopedia of Puerto Rico want to make us. Of course, these comments are entirely the responsibility of their respective authors.